Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee>
To: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, taral(at)mail(dot)utexas(dot)edu, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types
Date: 1998-11-03 13:09:12
Message-ID: 363F0078.92A6348E@trust.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>
> There may be cases where a function of a null is not null as some people
> have pointed out but so far no one has come up with a practical example.

isnull(field)

is_any_null(field1,field2,field3)

are_all_nulls(field1,field2,field3)

value_or_default(NULL,defaultvalue)

---------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 1998-11-03 13:53:16 Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types
Previous Message Jason 1998-11-03 13:06:47 RE: [GENERAL] Upcoming 6.4 release issues