| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: kevent latch paths don't handle postmaster death well |
| Date: | 2020-10-14 22:57:22 |
| Message-ID: | 3637798.1602716242@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> (Hmm, I wonder about that Windows process exit event.)
If anyone wants to test that, I can save you a little time building
infrastructure, perhaps. I used the attached program built into a .so.
After creating the function, invoke it, and once it's blocked kill -9
the postmaster. If it successfully reports multiple WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH
results then it's good.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| checkpmdeath.c | text/x-c | 782 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2020-10-14 22:59:42 | Re: kevent latch paths don't handle postmaster death well |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-10-14 22:50:18 | Re: kevent latch paths don't handle postmaster death well |