Re: Compatibility GUC for serializable

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Compatibility GUC for serializable
Date: 2011-01-11 01:04:19
Message-ID: 3637.1294707859@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> How is this different from our other backwards-compatibility GUCs?

Mainly, that it's not clear we need it. Nobody's pointed to a concrete
failure mechanism that makes it necessary for an existing app to run
under fake-SERIALIZABLE mode.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-01-11 01:09:19 Re: GIN indexscans versus equality selectivity estimation
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-11 00:55:57 Re: Compatibility GUC for serializable