Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment

From: Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date: 2020-06-02 20:49:35
Message-ID: 3636F2F8-3D41-4377-9B61-905D269657FD@comcast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> Eh, that's something that I think we should be looking at supporting, by
> using FDWs, but I haven't tried to figure out how hard it'd be.
>

How good will that be in performance.

In db2 you can do it using dblinks and that kills performance. isn't FDW something like dblink.

The cool part is that in SQLServer the optimizer recognizes 3 part name and caching works also.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2020-06-02 21:16:59 Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Previous Message Christophe Pettus 2020-06-02 20:41:53 Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment