From: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alexander Farber <alexander(dot)farber(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: select array_remove(ARRAY[NULL,NULL,NULL],NULL); returns {} instead of {NULL,NULL,NULL} |
Date: | 2016-08-08 21:51:44 |
Message-ID: | 3635FE2A-A171-468C-ABFA-7EBE40B17BD1@gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On 08 Aug 2016, at 20:19, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Alexander Farber <alexander(dot)farber(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I wonder, why the following returns NULL and not 0 in 9.5.3?
>
>> # select array_length(array_remove(ARRAY[NULL,NULL,NULL],NULL), 1);
>
> Because the result of the array_remove is an empty array, which is
> defined to be zero-dimensional in PG.
Reading this, I'm a bit confused about why:
select array_remove(ARRAY[NULL, NULL, NULL], NULL);
Results in:
array_remove
--------------
{}
(1 row)
How does it now which unknown value to remove from that array of unknown values? Shouldn't the result be:
{NULL,NULL,NULL}?
(Sorry for sort-of hijacking this thread)
Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll find there is no forest.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-08-08 22:14:26 | Re: select array_remove(ARRAY[NULL,NULL,NULL],NULL); returns {} instead of {NULL,NULL,NULL} |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-08-08 21:44:18 | Re: Column order in multi column primary key |