| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Galbavy" <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |
| Date: | 2003-04-10 13:57:41 |
| Message-ID: | 3625.1049983061@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
"Peter Galbavy" <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net> writes:
> Is there any message - speaking from a standpoint of a normal user and not a
> source hacker WRT postgresql - where knowing the length of the response is
> either unknown or is expensive (in buffering) to find out ?
See my response to ljb --- I think that in practice people assemble each
message before sending anyway. If you don't do it that way, you've got
a problem with recovering if you hit an error condition after sending a
partial message.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Crawford | 2003-04-10 15:55:01 | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-04-10 13:12:56 | Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | guru prasad | 2003-04-10 14:39:00 | Re: Memory leak!! |
| Previous Message | Himmet Karaman | 2003-04-10 13:06:23 | PLEASE HELP ME URGENT about choosing only the ones that i want while entering the data to postgresql with pgaccess on linux or windows or pgadmin II |