| From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | odbc installation broken |
| Date: | 1998-10-14 02:24:25 |
| Message-ID: | 36240B59.3FD8188E@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hey, the odbc stuff no longer installs. There is a softlink from what
used to be the shared library to itself. What were you trying to
accomplish with the patch? I'm not sure I'll fix it correctly if I don't
know where you are headed with it...
In general, it's ok to have the actual library be named with an explicit
major and minor version number, then have softlinks with a name having
the major version and no version number, right?
- Tom
revision 1.4
date: 1998/10/09 21:28:50; author: momjian; state: Exp; lines: +5 -5
major/minor shared name cleanup
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 1998-10-14 02:36:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 1998-10-14 02:20:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Alternative to LIMIT in SELECT ? |