Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster
Date: 2023-01-28 01:39:49
Message-ID: 3604732.1674869989@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The nearby thread about searching for uses of volatile reminded me: we
> can now drop a bunch of these in postmaster.c. The patch I originally
> wrote to do that as part of this series somehow morphed into an
> experimental patch to nuke all global variables[1], but of course we
> should at least drop the now redundant use of volatile and
> sigatomic_t. See attached.

+1

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-01-28 01:55:42 Re: recovery modules
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-01-28 01:39:04 Re: Small omission in type_sanity.sql