Re: PITR: XLog File compression on Archive

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PITR: XLog File compression on Archive
Date: 2004-08-24 14:58:54
Message-ID: 3604.1093359534@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> But it can contain newer blocks than WAL records would expect.
> Will it not matter if e.g. a page split for a btree index is already in the
> index file, but a WAL record exists, that references the not yet split page?

No. This is not different from the crash-recovery situation: we always
check to see if the update was already applied.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-08-24 14:58:56 Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-24 14:46:23 Re: AT TIME ZONE