Re: WAL & ZFS

From: Holger Jakobs <holger(at)jakobs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL & ZFS
Date: 2022-03-31 22:47:36
Message-ID: 35c98a4b-f7a1-a896-4484-582bbaaffb5b@jakobs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

The WAL is a journal itself and doesn't need another journal for safety.
Therefore, a common recommendation is using ext2 (which has no journal)
for the WAL partition.

Is this correct?

Am 31.03.22 um 23:32 schrieb Rui DeSousa:
> I would recommend a separate pg_wal filesystem with the record size to match the WAL page size; in my case 16k. I have keep the default record size at 128k for the data volume and that configuration has worked well for supporting large DSS while using 16k data blocks.
>
>> On Mar 30, 2022, at 5:32 PM, Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> I've read all the info I could find re running PG on ZFS: turn off full page writes, turn on lz4, tweak recordsize so as to take advantage of compression, etc. One thing I haven't seen is whether a separate volume for WAL would benefit from a larger recordsize. Or any other tweaks???
>>
>> --
>> Scott Ribe
>> scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach, Tel. +49-178-9759012

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Ribe 2022-03-31 22:58:08 Re: WAL & ZFS
Previous Message Rui DeSousa 2022-03-31 21:32:58 Re: WAL & ZFS