Re: [HACKERS] AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Date: 1998-09-13 14:27:12
Message-ID: 35FBD640.7F390022@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I checked latest cvs and notice when I do 'vacuum analyze'
> I got:
>
> flats=> vacuum analyze;
> NOTICE: AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
> NOTICE: AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
>
> 23:09[om]:~/mian/flats/sql>psql flats
> Connection to database 'flats' failed.

I see a small problem in running VACUUM ANALYZE on the regression
database which involves an entry in pg_operator left over from the
char16 datatype. If the line containing "1004" is removed and the system
is "make clean install; initdb"'d then vacuum completes successfully on
that database.

Can you try this test on the regression database (after removing that
line from pg_operator)?

make runtest
psql regression
regression=> vacuum analyze;

If that succeeds for you, then you will need to describe your test
scenerio in more detail. If it fails, then perhaps try backing-off of
your bleeding-edge compiler and kernel (maybe start by compiling -m486
instead of -mpentium). btw, I'm running Linux kernel 2.0.30, gcc 2.7.2.1
from RH4.2...

Regards.

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-09-13 16:40:57 Re: [HACKERS] Missing headers Windows NT port
Previous Message David Hartwig 1998-09-13 14:18:54 Re: [HACKERS] Serial Data Type