Re: [HACKERS] Patch for initdb

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch for initdb
Date: 1998-09-10 01:54:23
Message-ID: 35F7314F.B16C7FC5@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Applied. Let's see if this fixes the pg_user problem.

Looks like not, and even if it did I would be worried. We shouldn't have
segfaults from query cleanup even if a table name is a bit screwy...

postgres=> select * from pg_user;
pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.

> > Here's a patch for initdb that does two things.
> > Are there any docs considerations?

There is a diagram of system tables which is now out of date. No real
mention of these tables elsewhere in the sgml docs (yet). Feel free to
write some, but the patch by itself doesn't obligate you to :)

- Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1998-09-10 03:02:36 fix for libpq choking on varlen fields
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-09-10 01:19:10 Re: [HACKERS] regression test errors: netbsd 1.3.2/i386