From: | Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | cert(at)lists(dot)postgresqlcertification(dot)org, greg(at)tcscs(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
Date: | 2008-02-04 15:20:23 |
Message-ID: | 35BBBE6E-ED46-4759-8F3D-1502177649B1@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
how can we determine which companies are certified from the beginning?
i think it makes no sense to push redhat, for instance, through a
certification process as they have tom and some others :).
where do you draw the line here?
would we have to certified? we have a couple of patches in. who would
have to certify?
many thanks,
hans
--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
PostgreSQL Solutions and Support
Gröhrmühlgasse 26, 2700 Wiener Neustadt
Tel: +43/1/205 10 35 / 340
www.postgresql.at, www.cybertec.at
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-02-04 15:32:03 | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-02-04 15:07:45 | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pau Marc Munoz Torres | 2008-02-04 15:29:51 | loading files into tables |
Previous Message | fkater@googlemail.com | 2008-02-04 15:14:12 | backup tableoids (pg_class.oid) ? |