From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | David Hartwig <daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres |
Date: | 1998-07-09 14:25:30 |
Message-ID: | 35A4D2DA.2D066E6C@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
> I am curious though. Did you apply the patch, mentioned below, to
> your latest 6.4 tree? This patch should have been already part of
> the latest 6.4. And, to my knowledge, it was already applied
> completely and successfully.
I did my final tests using a fresh cvs tree two days ago just before
committing my big "patch wad". In the last two or three weeks I did have
a "merge problem" with my patches in the resjunk area, which might have
been the patches you are talking about.
> Now that I think of it, though, this version of the patch does not
> include the new "output" and "sql" files necessary for the regression
> test. In any case, I should clean that up.
I am in the process of renaming and moving the "resjunk" test to
"select_implicit". Will try to commit the changes this morning so it is
available to you.
At the moment, all regression tests (except "random") pass on my Linux
box :)
- Tom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Maarten Boekhold | 1998-07-09 14:31:24 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle |
Previous Message | Egon Schmid | 1998-07-09 14:17:10 | InitPostgres() fails through libpq |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cyril FERRAND | 1998-07-09 14:49:04 | a JDBC applet |
Previous Message | David Hartwig | 1998-07-09 14:13:43 | Re: [INTERFACES] AOLserver 2.3 |