| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Steve Baldwin <steve(dot)baldwin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql 15 for RHEL RPMs available? |
| Date: | 2022-10-02 21:09:17 |
| Message-ID: | 3586254A-86AD-4E68-9C50-C9B84CC1E6D7@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On 2 Oct 2022, at 23:05, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Steve Baldwin <steve(dot)baldwin(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Looks like it's official ? - https://www.postgresql.org/docs/release/15.0/
>
> No, that's just the RC1 version. Note the "Release date:" line is still
> not set.
This highlights an interesting thing with the website that I hadn't noticed
before, the release notes in the docs show the yellow "unsupported version"
banner while the release notes from the quick link menu does not:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/release-15.html
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/release/15.0/
We should probably make those also show the same banner to avoid confusion like
this.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Nolan | 2022-10-02 21:31:25 | Re: postgresql 15 for RHEL RPMs available? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-10-02 21:05:59 | Re: postgresql 15 for RHEL RPMs available? |