| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RC1 time? |
| Date: | 2002-01-04 06:50:38 |
| Message-ID: | 3583.1010127038@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Aside from the lwlock business, Karel seems to be seeing some problem
>> in to_timestamp/to_date.
> I thought Karel sent in a to_date patch yesterday that you applied. Was
> there another issue?
Yes. He reported something that looked a lot like a DST boundary
problem, except it wasn't on a DST boundary date. Thomas thought it
might be a consequence of the timestamp-vs-timestamptz change from
7.1 to 7.2. See http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1345390
(BTW, is anyone else noticing that fts.postgresql.org is missing an
awful lot of traffic? For example, I can't get it to show Thomas'
comment on the above-mentioned thread; and that is *VERY* far from
being its only omission lately.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-01-04 06:52:45 | Re: RC1 time? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-01-04 06:46:53 | freebsd/alpha probs |