From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Jonathan Allen <jallen(at)americansavingslife(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Akio Iwaasa <aki-iwaasa(at)vt(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT |
Date: | 2018-05-20 14:11:18 |
Message-ID: | 3578.1526825478@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 05/20/2018 12:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm ... this might be too much of a coincidence, but I can't help noticing
>> that the places that are going south with -D__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO are
>> pretty nearly the same ones I just pointed to in
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/21670.1526769114@sss.pgh.pa.us
>> as using "%lf". I'd supposed that that was mostly compulsive neatnik-ism,
>> but is it possible that mingw's "ansi stdio" library is actually
>> sensitive to that?
> Yeah, it sure is. With that applied ecpg-check actually passes on
> frogmouth. If you apply it to all the live branches I'll re-enable the
> tests.
Huh. I'd have laid long odds that I was just being anal-retentive ...
but sometimes it pays. Will push the fix later today.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | 158306855 | 2018-05-21 02:49:53 | Re: [BUG] Re-entering malloc problem when use --enable-nls buildpostgresql |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-05-20 13:38:18 | Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT |