From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size |
Date: | 2022-08-09 19:17:44 |
Message-ID: | 35778.1660072664@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Speaking personally, I would like to see what we could do to include
> support for this batch of the SQL/JSON features in v15. What is included
> looks like it closes most of the gap on what we've been missing
> syntactically since the standard was adopted, and the JSON_TABLE work is
> very convenient for converting JSON data into a relational format. I
> believe having this feature set is important for maintaining standards
> compliance, interoperability, tooling support, and general usability.
> Plus, JSON still seems to be pretty popular :)
> ...
> I hope that these can be addressed satisfactorily in a reasonable (read:
> now a much shorter) timeframe so we can include the SQL/JSON work in v15.
We have delayed releases for $COOL_FEATURE in the past, and I think
our batting average on that is still .000: not once has it worked out
well. I think we're better off getting the pain over with quickly,
so I regretfully vote for revert. And for a full redesign/rewrite
before we try again; based on Andres' comments, it needs that.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-08-09 19:21:57 | Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-08-09 18:57:25 | Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size |