Re: [HACKERS] CVSup

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: "Kent S(dot) Gordon" <kgor(at)inetspace(dot)com>
Cc: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Postgres Documentation List <docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CVSup
Date: 1998-05-01 13:36:47
Message-ID: 3549CFEF.225EFDDF@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >> If you remove the 'tag=.' part of the CVSup config file, you
> >> can pull down the complete CVS repository to your machine to
> >> manipulate as you want to...
> >>
> 1) Remote CVS is a resource pig, especially for large tree. It puts a
> large load on the server. I would guess the load is easily 10x larger
> for remote CVS vs CVSUP. cvs log/diff being local instead of over the
> internet is great for development especially with dialup lines to the
> Internet.
> 2) The ability to have a local copy of the 'official tree' allows for
> some possible ideas to work easier. If one is making local changes
> the 'official tree' could be done as vendor imports into a local tree
> allowing local changes not to be overwritten.

Would someone be interested in collecting CVSup information (at least
partly from the mhonarc archive)? We could/should have a chapter in the
Developer's Guide on this...

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kent S. Gordon 1998-05-01 13:47:23 Re: [HACKERS] CVSup
Previous Message Kent S. Gordon 1998-05-01 13:16:36 Re: [HACKERS] CVSup