Re: Losing data because of problematic configuration?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Holtgrewe, Manuel" <manuel(dot)holtgrewe(at)bih-charite(dot)de>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Losing data because of problematic configuration?
Date: 2021-06-15 13:39:31
Message-ID: 354782.1623764371@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Holtgrewe, Manuel" <manuel(dot)holtgrewe(at)bih-charite(dot)de> writes:
> So it looks as if the database jumps back "half an hour" to ensure consistent data. Everything in between is lost.

Postgres does not lose committed data --- if it did, we'd consider that a
fairly serious bug. (Well, there are caveats of course. But most of them
have to do with operating-system crashes or power loss, neither of which
are at stake here.)

I am wondering about this though:

> < 2021-06-15 12:33:04.537 CEST > DEBUG: resetting unlogged relations: cleanup 1 init 0

Are you perhaps keeping your data in an UNLOGGED table? If so, resetting
it to empty after a crash is exactly what's supposed to happen. The
entire point of UNLOGGED is that the performance benefits come at the
cost of losing the data on crash.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-06-15 13:43:22 Re: Memory alloc exception
Previous Message Vijaykumar Jain 2021-06-15 13:26:39 Re: immutable function querying table for partitioning