Re: Capping CPU usage?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pgsql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Capping CPU usage?
Date: 2002-12-12 05:52:10
Message-ID: 3547.1039672330@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
>> I had a new question from a client: is it possible to "cap" CPU usage
>> for PostgreSQL running on Linux?

> Anyway, would it be sufficient to simply reduce the priority of the
> process?

If the issue is to prevent Postgres *as a whole* from hogging CPU usage,
I would think that nice-ing the postmaster at launch would work
beautifully. Requests like "I want Postgres to use no more than 30%
of CPU" make no sense to me: if the CPU is otherwise idle, why should
you insist on reserving 70% of it for the idle loop?

But what we commonly see is "I want to cap the resource usage of this
particular query", and that is a whole lot harder. You cannot win by
nice-ing one single backend, because of priority-inversion concerns.
(The queries you would like to be high-priority might be blocked waiting
for locks held by low-priority backends.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-12-12 07:13:02 Re: Good/Bad RAID and SCSI controllers?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-12-12 05:41:33 Re: Docs: GIST