From: | Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jamie Tufnell <diesql(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Having difficulty writing a "best-fit" query.. |
Date: | 2007-10-16 17:14:59 |
Message-ID: | 354400.92381.qm@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
--- Jamie Tufnell <diesql(at)googlemail(dot)com> wrote:
> movie_id, genre_id, relevance (i've used movie/genre titles for clarity
> here, but in reality they're id's)
> --------------------------------------------
> beverly hills cop, action, 2
> beverly hills cop, comedy, 1
> the heartbreak kid, comedy, 2
> the heartbreak kid, romance, 1
> First of all, if there's a better way to model this kind of ranking/ordering
> of many-to-many relationships, please let me know.
Joe Celko had an example like this in his book:
17: EMPLOYMENT AGENCY PUZZLE
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/bookdescription.cws_home/710075/description#description
the only difference was that he was modeling employees and skillsets. IIRC, the terminology for
the improved model was the "full disjuctive" model.
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Harald Fuchs | 2007-10-16 17:32:10 | Re: Having difficulty writing a "best-fit" query.. |
Previous Message | Rodrigo De León | 2007-10-16 17:11:16 | Re: Having difficulty writing a "best-fit" query.. |