Re: Unsigned integer types

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Maciej Gajewski <maciej(dot)gajewski0(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unsigned integer types
Date: 2013-05-31 17:17:00
Message-ID: 3538D042-676D-4937-9BCB-C498D9195EBE@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May 29, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:

> If you do it, having uint1 (1 byte) would be nice as well.

There is a signed 1byte int on PGXN, FWIW:

http://pgxn.org/extension/tinyint

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-05-31 17:17:09 Re: removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-05-31 17:14:13 Re: removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE