From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Perl 5.10 vs. PG 8.4 on Win32 |
Date: | 2009-05-15 14:47:38 |
Message-ID: | 3533.1242398858@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Ho, that's pretty curious. The first two messages are the trace of the
>> atexit hook I recently installed, which means something called exit()
>> or the moral equivalent thereof. I wouldn't really expect that to
>> happen in a crash situation ... is Windows dumb enough to try to run
>> the atexit hooks of a crashed process?
> Hmm, the MSDN docs don't say whether or not it will. A quick test,
> forcing a crash by writing beyond the end of a char array shows that
> it does follow spec and doesn't call the hooks.
Try setting a breakpoint at atexit_callback() and seeing how it got
there in the CREATE LANGUAGE test case.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-05-15 14:59:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-05-15 14:44:32 | Re: Perl 5.10 vs. PG 8.4 on Win32 |