From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Sushrut Shivaswamy <sushrut(dot)shivaswamy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reading timestamp values from Datums gives garbage values |
Date: | 2024-05-20 16:44:14 |
Message-ID: | 3528491.1716223454@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 5/20/24 16:37, Sushrut Shivaswamy wrote:
>> When trying to read the query response from the Datum, I get garbage values.
>> I've tried various types and none of them read the correct value.
> TimestampTz is int64, so using DatumGetInt64 is probably the simplest
> solution. And it's the number of microseconds, so X/1e6 should give you
> the epoch.
Don't forget that TimestampTz uses an epoch (time zero) of 2000-01-01.
If you want a Unix-convention value where the epoch is 1970-01-01,
you'll need to add 30 years to the result.
The reported values seem pretty substantially off, though ---
5293917674 would be barely an hour and a half later than the
epoch, which seems unlikely to be the value Sushrut intended
to test with. I suspect a mistake that's outside the fragment
of code we were shown.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2024-05-20 16:44:23 | Re: PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement draft |
Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2024-05-20 16:42:57 | Re: Reading timestamp values from Datums gives garbage values |