From: | "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Maurice Gittens <mgittens(at)gits(dot)nl>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Everything leaks; How it mm suppose to work? |
Date: | 1998-04-05 13:39:03 |
Message-ID: | 35278977.BFC88880@sable.krasnoyarsk.su |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Then I ran profiling on the two queries I mentioned, where one leaks and
> one doesn't, and found that the leaking one had 500 extra calls to
> malloc. Grep'ing out the calls and comparing the output of the two
> profiles, I found:
>
> 0.00 0.00 1/527 ___irs_gen_acc [162]
> 0.00 0.00 35/527 _GetDatabasePath [284]
> 0.00 0.00 491/527 _GetDatabaseName [170]
> [166] 0.8 0.00 0.00 527 _strdup [166]
> 0.00 0.00 527/2030 _malloc [105]
> 0.00 0.00 527/604 _strlen [508]
> 0.00 0.00 527/532 _bcopy [515]
>
> I believe this code was modified by Vadim to fix our problem with blind
> write errors when using psql while the regression tests were being run.
>
> Am I correct on this? I have not developed a fix yet.
Only src/backend/storage/smgr/md.c:mdblindwrt() was changed...
Vadim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-04-05 13:47:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3.1 issues |
Previous Message | Maurice Gittens | 1998-04-05 13:31:51 | On improving OO support in posgresql and relaxing oid bottleneck at the same time |