Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] inherited sequences and primary keys

From: "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>
To: David Gould <dg(at)illustra(dot)com>
Cc: Maurice Gittens <mgittens(at)gits(dot)nl>, brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org, pgsql-questions(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] inherited sequences and primary keys
Date: 1998-04-03 08:23:52
Message-ID: 35249C98.BF3081DC@sable.krasnoyarsk.su
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Gould wrote:
>
> Agreed. There are lots of pretty decent relation dbms's out there. There are
> very few Object Relational dbms's. I happen to think ORDBMS is a really cool
> idea and have seen some great applications done with it that a straight
> up RDBMS just couldn't do. So my vote is for ORDBMS.
>
> That said, postgresql needs to become a much better RDBMS that it currently
> is.

Agreed.
Unfortunately, there are many problems in all areas of postgres.
And time is limited :(

Vadim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maurice Gittens 1998-04-03 08:45:16 Re: [HACKERS] Its not my fault. Its SEG's FAULT!
Previous Message David Gould 1998-04-03 07:31:03 Re: [HACKERS] inherited sequences and primary keys