| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs |
| Date: | 2021-05-19 19:35:00 |
| Message-ID: | 3506449.1621452900@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> IIRC, the CF app also rejects threads on pgsql-bugs, which is even
>> more pointlessly annoying. Couldn't we just remove that restriction
>> altogether, and allow anything posted to some pgsql list?
> It's not technically rejecting anything, it's just explicitly looking
> in -hackers and doesn't even know the others exist :)
> Changing that to look globally can certainly be done. It takes a bit
> of work I think, as there are no API endpoints today that will do
> that, but those could be added.
Ah. Personally, I'd settle for it checking -hackers, -docs and -bugs.
Perhaps there's some case for -general as well.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-05-19 19:39:53 | Re: Commitfest app vs. pgsql-docs |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-05-19 19:25:55 | Re: pg_rewind fails if there is a read only file. |