Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date: 2010-02-25 20:11:00
Message-ID: 34d269d41002251211j70a1a46dr6c91efbe57796828@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 13:03, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:59, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:
>> Just don't break anything in 9.0 that relies on plperl please. :) To that
>> end, let me know when HEAD has something somewhat stable, and I'll
>> run some tests against it (e.g. Bucardo, which uses lots of plperl)
>
> Defiantly, the goal is to not break anything :).

Err oops, as David Fetter pointed out... I *think* i meant to say definitely.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Bunce 2010-02-25 20:58:14 Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-02-25 20:03:44 Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)