From: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH] |
Date: | 2010-01-27 07:46:42 |
Message-ID: | 34d269d41001262346m42712117m82341f05675d9ede@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 23:14, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Tim Bunce wrote:
>>> - Added plperl.on_perl_init GUC for DBA use (PGC_SIGHUP)
>>> SPI functions are not available when the code is run.
>>>
>>> - Added normal interpreter destruction behaviour
>>> END blocks, if any, are run then objects are
>>> destroyed, calling their DESTROY methods, if any.
>>> SPI functions will die if called at this time.
>
>> So, are there still objections to applying this patch?
>
> Yes.
FWIW the atexit scares me to. I was thinking a good workaround
perhaps would be to provide a function that destroys the interpreter
(so that the END blocks get called). Tim would that work OK ? If we
are still worried about that hanging we can probably do something
hacky with alarm() and/or signals...
Maybe a good solid use case will help figure this out? Im assuming
the current one is to profile plperl functions and dump a prof file in
/tmp/ or some such (which happens at END time). Or did I miss the use
case in one of the other threads?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-01-27 08:50:19 | Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2010-01-27 07:21:44 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb) |