From: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Setting oom_adj on linux? |
Date: | 2010-01-08 15:24:05 |
Message-ID: | 34d269d41001080724w4e70deb4n701f549bfb727c31@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 07:53, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 20:26, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The usual solution for this kind of thing is:
>
> #ifdef LINUX
> #define OOM_ADJUST oom_adjust()
> #else
> #define OOM_ADJUST do {} while (0)
> #endif
>
> so there is no call or dummy function and you reference it in the code
> as:
Surely any compiler worth its salt would turn a call to an empty void
function into a noop? Then again maybe I just hate macros :)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-08 15:42:25 | Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-08 15:18:19 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |