| From: | "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: stupid subselect core dumps |
| Date: | 1998-02-18 06:27:42 |
| Message-ID: | 34EA7F5E.FDCD8854@sable.krasnoyarsk.su |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
>
> I know this is too simple to be useful, but it was the first test case I
> tried for a regression test :)
>
> regression=> SELECT 1 AS one WHERE 1 IN (SELECT 1);
> PQexec() -- Request was sent to backend, but backend closed the channel
> before responding.
> This probably means the backend terminated abnormally before or
> while processing the request.
>
> Should we disallow parts of this in or near the parser, or can the
> backend possibly handle it?
Fixed. Patch for nodeResult.c follows.
Vadim
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| DF | application/octet-stream | 638 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-02-18 06:54:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Memory leaks for large objects |
| Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-02-18 06:05:53 | stupid subselect core dumps |