Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] full JDBC driver ?

From: Phil Thompson <phil(at)river-bank(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] full JDBC driver ?
Date: 1998-02-14 00:05:24
Message-ID: 34E4DFC4.63E827BA@river-bank.demon.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter T Mount wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Peter T Mount wrote:
> >
> > > Getting most of the rest of DatabaseMetaData is my main priority after 6.3
> > > is released. However, there are some methods that cannot yet be
> > > implemented because postgresql itself isn't yet up to it.
> >
> > Like?

Isn't the "right" way to do this to implement the standard
INFORMATION_SCHEMA, then all frontends have a decent model to work to?

Phil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message al dev 1998-02-14 00:13:10 performace speed up suggestions.
Previous Message Keith Parks 1998-02-13 23:45:04 Indexes and OR clauses.