From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Hi |
Date: | 1998-02-04 14:29:07 |
Message-ID: | 34D87B32.860F2B9F@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> 1) Is there an embedded SQL preprocessor available? I read about an
> alpha version, but is it still maintained?
I remember mention of it on the list a while ago, but have not heard
anything since. Also, no code for this was contributed for the
distribution, and it should be included. It would be _great_ to have a real
preprocessor.
> 3) How would you describe the general goal of this project: Offer as
> good a database system as you can create as free software? That is
> should it be able to handle huge amounts of data, or is it seen more as
> a tool for a private person/small business?
As scrappy pointed out, we would like to not forget either kind of user.
However, afaik PostgreSQL is the closest to a "heavyweight" RDBMS available
in the freeware world, so if we had to choose we would probably put
ourselves on the "huge amounts of data" end of the spectrum.
> 4) Are there areas/Which areas need help?
The ToDo has lots of projects. Also, as you get started and learn the
details of Postgres internals the docs project could use some contributions
:).
There are other areas which are not yet called out in the ToDo list,
including
- recovery of munged databases (I think disk full conditions may cause
damage)
- transaction-only and session-only tables, variables, etc.
- re-think the table/type interface to allow more extensibility of types
But, picking simpler items from the ToDo is probably the best way to get
familiar with pieces of the code.
Welcome.
- Tom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Meskes, Michael | 1998-02-04 14:30:11 | RE: [HACKERS] Hi |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-02-04 13:42:11 | RE: [HACKERS] Hi |