Re: [HACKERS] subquery syntax broken

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] subquery syntax broken
Date: 1998-02-02 15:41:22
Message-ID: 34D5E922.C1353E2F@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tom, Bruce - could you take care about this ?

Bruce? Let me know if you want me to look at it. I didn't include this
syntax originally since I thought singleton results like aggregates would
certainly not be implemented in the first cut. Forgot about Vadim's
prodigious talents :)

> (BTW, I fixed parse_expr.c broken for EXISTS...)
> I'm going home now and will be here ~ 2 Feb 20:00 (PST). Hope to include
> subselect code into CVS in the next 24 hrs (from now)...
>
> Also, could someone take care about data/queries for regression tests ?
> (May be by using "big boys"...)

Yes, we should add a "subselect.sql" regression test. Anyone taking a first
cut?

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-02-02 15:54:29 Re: [HACKERS] FAQs
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-02-02 15:28:12 Re: [HACKERS] snapshot won't compile on irix6.2