Re: [HACKERS] Variable block size...

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Variable block size...
Date: 1998-02-02 02:40:12
Message-ID: 34D5320C.7BD3C2C8@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Looks like this variable size stuff will be the first new feature
> > for 6.4 then, eh? :)
>
> What is the chance of having this ready by Friday? Still would
> give us 3weeks of debugging...

Well, it's OK to leave _one_ feature for v6.4. Bruce is probably tired of typing
the feature list :)

Also, we still have a few loose ends for v6.3. But, I'll bet Darren's stuff can
go in and not affect anything if we run using the current block size.

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Hughes 1998-02-02 04:54:21 VACUUM ANALYZE Problem (debugging output)
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-02-02 02:24:04 What is ##?