| From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter T Mount <psqlhack(at)maidast(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] grant broken |
| Date: | 1998-01-10 16:34:25 |
| Message-ID: | 34B7A311.C35B4454@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Can you give me a test case? Is it \z on an empty database, or does a
> > table have to have a specific permissoin?
>
> It's a test database, with a single table in it, and two users (the DBA,
> and a normal user).
>
> One of the methods in JDBC's DatabaseMetaData returns details about the
> rights granted on the database, so to test the method, I was setting up
> the normal user with update rights to the table, so I had something to
> work on.
>
> The backend simply dies when ever the grant statement is entered
> correctly.
If I understood the test case you published, you are specifying to the grant
command the database "test", not a table within the database. The man page for
grant is not very specific, but is this supposed to work?
- Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vadim B. Mikheev | 1998-01-10 17:19:08 | Re: subselects |
| Previous Message | Goran Thyni | 1998-01-10 15:24:52 | Re: [HACKERS] DefaultHost |