From: | "Matt Mello" <alien(at)spaceship(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | implied FROM |
Date: | 2003-05-02 02:06:37 |
Message-ID: | 34943.24.243.219.116.1051841197.squirrel@earth.spaceship.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hello, all. New to this list. If this isn't the right place for this
issue, please let me know.
Here is a condensed version of the situation. I have two tables (STORE and
APPLIANCE). They share a field name STOREID, where the field is a primary
key in STORE and a foreign key in APPLIANCE.
1) Here is what I *should* have typed in:
select appliance.storeid from appliance where appliance.applianceid = 32;
2) Here is what I accidentally typed in:
select store.storeid from appliance where appliance.applianceid = 32;
#1 gives me a single int4 column in a single-row resultset.
#2 gives me a single int4 column in a resultset that has a row for every row
in STORE.
I finally figured out my error, but I would have found it much faster if the
problem query had thrown an exception.
So, why doesn't asking for a field from a table that IS NOT in the from
clause throw an exception? Isn't it violating the SQL language? Why is PG
implying FROM tables?
Thanks!
--
Matt Mello
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | A.Bhuvaneswaran | 2003-05-02 04:45:00 | Re: differences between oracle,pgsql,sybase |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-05-01 17:04:20 | Re: date use in for loop |