| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: "could not adopt C locale" failure at startup on Windows | 
| Date: | 2015-06-10 14:09:38 | 
| Message-ID: | 3490.1433945378@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:24:02PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, my first instinct was to blame ca325941 as well, but I don't think
>> any of that code executes during init_locale().  Also,
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150326040321.2492.24716@wrigleys.postgresql.org
>> says it's been seen in 9.4.1.
> The return value check and error message were new in 9.4.1.  I suspect the
> underlying problem has been present far longer, undetected.
Oooh ... I'd forgotten that 6fdba8ceb was so recent.  Agreed, what we are
seeing is probably a situation that's been there for a long time, but we
were ignoring the failure up to now (and, evidently, it wasn't really
creating any problems).
> I can reproduce this with "initdb --locale=C",
> postgresql-9.4.3-1-windows-binaries.zip (32-bit), Windows 7 x64, and the
> Windows ANSI code page set to CP936.  (Choose "Chinese (Simplified, PRC)" in
> Control Panel -> Region and Language -> Administrative -> Language for
> non-Unicode programs.)  It is neither necessary nor sufficient to change
> Control Panel -> Region and Language -> Formats -> Format.  Binaries from
> postgresql-9.4.3-1-windows-x64-binaries.zip do not exhibit the problem.  Note
> that CP936 is a PG_ENCODING_IS_CLIENT_ONLY() encoding.
Hm.  I could understand getting encoding difficulties in that environment,
but it's hard to see why they'd manifest like this.  Can you trace through
pg_perm_setlocale and figure out why it's reporting failure?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nils Goroll | 2015-06-10 14:12:05 | Re: s_lock() seems too aggressive for machines with many sockets | 
| Previous Message | Nils Goroll | 2015-06-10 14:07:50 | Re: s_lock() seems too aggressive for machines with many sockets |