| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Getting better results from valgrind leak tracking |
| Date: | 2021-03-17 03:23:42 |
| Message-ID: | 3480636.1615951422@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Hm. For me the number of leaks seem to stay the same with or without
> your changes related to this. Is this a USE_VALGRIND build?
Not sure how you arrived at that answer. I attach two logs of individual
backends running with
--leak-check=full --track-origins=yes --read-var-info=yes --error-exitcode=0
The test scenario in both cases was just start up, run "select 2+2;",
quit. The first one is before I'd made any of the changes shown
before, the second is after.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| initialrun.log | text/plain | 142.3 KB |
| somefixes.log | text/plain | 20.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-03-17 03:45:05 | Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-03-17 03:16:58 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |