| From: | Niels Kristian Schjødt <nielskristian(at)autouncle(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Benjamin Krajmalnik" <kraj(at)servoyant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, "Craig James" <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New server setup |
| Date: | 2013-03-05 18:27:32 |
| Message-ID: | 347B9E13-2D2E-468E-BCFE-E5FA49976166@autouncle.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Okay, thanks - but hey - if I put it at session pooling, then it says in the documentation: "default_pool_size: In session pooling it needs to be the number of max clients you want to handle at any moment". So as I understand it, is it true that I then have to set default_pool_size to 300 if I have up to 300 client connections? And then what would the pooler then help on my performance - would that just be exactly like having the 300 clients connect directly to the database???
-NK
Den 05/03/2013 kl. 19.03 skrev "Benjamin Krajmalnik" <kraj(at)servoyant(dot)com>:
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jon Nelson | 2013-03-05 19:35:51 | sniff test on some PG 8.4 numbers |
| Previous Message | Benjamin Krajmalnik | 2013-03-05 18:03:44 | Re: New server setup |