From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration |
Date: | 2003-06-25 15:34:14 |
Message-ID: | 3474.1056555254@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I have started working on tablespaces (to the extent that I am capable!),
> based not on the rejected patch, but on Jim's eventual syntax proposal that
> was never developed.
Has anyone looked at the syntaxes used by other databases to control
tablespaces (Oracle, DB2, etc)? I have no strong desire to slavishly
follow Oracle, but it would be a shame to miss out on any good ideas.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-25 15:36:21 | Re: pg_statistic_relid_att_index |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-06-25 15:30:31 | Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-06-25 15:42:29 | Re: RServ patch to support multiple slaves (sorta) |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-06-25 15:30:31 | Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration |