Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration
Date: 2003-06-25 15:34:14
Message-ID: 3474.1056555254@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I have started working on tablespaces (to the extent that I am capable!),
> based not on the rejected patch, but on Jim's eventual syntax proposal that
> was never developed.

Has anyone looked at the syntaxes used by other databases to control
tablespaces (Oracle, DB2, etc)? I have no strong desire to slavishly
follow Oracle, but it would be a shame to miss out on any good ideas.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-25 15:36:21 Re: pg_statistic_relid_att_index
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-06-25 15:30:31 Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-06-25 15:42:29 Re: RServ patch to support multiple slaves (sorta)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-06-25 15:30:31 Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration