Re: pgsql: Consolidate docs for vacuum-related GUCs in new subsection

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Consolidate docs for vacuum-related GUCs in new subsection
Date: 2025-01-12 19:21:07
Message-ID: 347096.1736709667@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> On 11 Jan 2025, at 10:02, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>> and the GUC grouping in guc_tables.c/h?

> I don't know what our policy around this is, and maybe the backpatching hazard
> isn't too bad here, but it doesn't entirely seem worth the churn.

I think the entire point of that categorization is to line up with the
docs, so our policy should be to fix this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-01-12 19:07:21 Re: pgsql: Consolidate docs for vacuum-related GUCs in new subsection

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-01-12 19:16:27 Re: benign bug in BufFileLoadBuffer / incorrect sizeof