Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix
Date: 2025-04-07 15:59:48
Message-ID: 3467149.1744041588@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The only thing that makes me a little bit sad is that we don't seem to
> have added this to pg_stat_activity.

Hmm, that seems like it'd be a completely separate discussion.

My main objection to the idea is that if we do that then everybody
will pay the overhead for it, whether they use it or not.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-04-07 16:20:15 Re: AIO v2.5
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-04-07 15:51:29 Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability