Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yuya Watari <watari(dot)yuya(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru>, Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Date: 2025-04-07 15:48:24
Message-ID: 3465620.1744040904@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think this is worthy of getting into v18. Does anyone else think
> differently? It'd be good to know that soon.

v41 passes an eyeball check for me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-04-07 15:51:29 Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-04-07 15:43:51 Re: Enhancing Memory Context Statistics Reporting