| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? |
| Date: | 2021-02-01 23:47:58 |
| Message-ID: | 3460909.1612223278@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 09:23, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Now that commit f003a7522 did away with the partitioned_rels fields,
>> my original motivation for doing $SUBJECT is gone. It might still be
>> worth doing, but I'm not planning to tackle it right now.
> I'm not sure if the misuse of Lists to store non-Node types should be
> all that surprising.
Well, as I tried to clarify upthread, it's only a problem if the list
is a subfield of a recognized Node type. Random private data structures
can and do contain lists of $whatever. But if you put something in a
Node type then you'd better be prepared to teach backend/nodes/*.c about
it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-02-01 23:52:14 | Re: Key management with tests |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-02-01 23:40:13 | Re: Proposal: Save user's original authenticated identity for logging |