Re: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: shtoorman(dot)sam(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"
Date: 2023-01-07 16:14:09
Message-ID: 3452214.1673108049@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> I think, the "integer" will be good choice instead "integral'":
> 8.5.2
> ...
> "The offset will be shown as hh (hours only) if it is an integral number of
> hours, else as hh:mm if it is an integral number of minutes, else as
> hh:mm:ss. (The third case is not possible with any modern"

"Integral" seems like perfectly good English to me here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2023-01-07 17:07:02 Re: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2023-01-07 11:24:23 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer"