From: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Date: | 2015-07-15 08:44:44 |
Message-ID: | 3441.1436949884@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached, find the rebased version of patch.
[I haven't read this thread so far, sorry for possibly redundant comment.]
I noticed that false is passed for required_outer agrument of
create_partialseqscan_path(), while NULL seems to be cleaner in terms of C
language.
But in terms of semantics, I'm not sure this is correct anyway. Why does
create_parallelscan_paths() not accept the actual rel->lateral_relids, just
like create_seqscan_path() does? (See set_plain_rel_pathlist().) If there's
reason for your approach, I think it's worth a comment.
BTW, emacs shows whitespace on otherwise empty line parallelpath.c:57.
--
Antonin Houska
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de, http://www.cybertec.at
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-07-15 08:57:52 | Re: max_worker_processes on the standby |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-07-15 08:24:24 | Re: [DESIGN] Incremental checksums |