Re: getpid() function

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: getpid() function
Date: 2002-08-03 16:30:09
Message-ID: 3434.1028392209@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> writes:
> You claimed that NOTIFY uses some _other_ backend id (i.e. not process
> id).

I did? Must have been momentary brain fade on my part. It's always
been process ID.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-03 17:06:36 Re: b1 OR b2 <-> ( CASE WHEN b1 THE true ELSE b2 END ): performance bottleneck on logical OR
Previous Message Vikram Kulkarni 2002-08-03 16:14:19 inconsistant regression test results...

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-03 16:41:35 Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2002-08-03 13:19:30 Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?