Re: what does it mean

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: what does it mean
Date: 2004-01-26 17:24:54
Message-ID: 34260000.1075137894@lerlaptop-red.iadfw.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On Monday, January 26, 2004 12:11:19 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:

> ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr writes:
>>>> I've upgraded my production system to 741 yesterday, and just
>>>> discovered this log message: statistic buffer is full.
>>>
>>> If you see this a lot, it might be worth increasing PGSTAT_RECVBUFFERSZ.
>>
>> How much is a lot? it occured ~30 times since 23pm (it's 17:48 pm now)
>
> Hm. I wonder whether something is interfering with the stats collection
> code on your system? I can't recall anyone else reporting seeing this
> log message, so I'm not convinced that PGSTAT_RECVBUFFERSZ is too small.
>
> What platform are you using, again?
UnixWare 7.1.3

LER

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-01-26 17:27:17 Re: 7.5 change documentation (was Re: cache control?)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-01-26 17:15:13 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] What's left?